A Scientist Keeps a Secret

My friend and fellow physicist Shane Larson studies gravitational waves, but it’s his enthusiasm for science of all kinds that defines him. By day he designs sophisticated space-based lasers to detect minute warps in spacetime. At night you are more likely to find him looking through a pair of binoculars at the Andromeda galaxy, marveling that he can see something two million light years away with his own eyes.

            Driving across the country from Bozeman, Montana, to his first postdoctoral appointment at Penn State, Shane devised an experiment to estimate the number of insects in the United States. He taped sheets of cardboard to the front of his car. Each evening he’d remove the card and each morning he’d replace it with a new one. At the end of the trip he counted the number of insects he’d collected. Multiplying the card’s area by the length of the trip gave him the volume of air and enough info to get the average density of insects. (By his calculations, about five million per cubic km, or 50 billion in the U.S. But who’s counting?)

            As a physics professor at Utah State University, he loaded himself and 20,000 bouncy balls into a helicopter and flew above the campus. He coordinated hundreds of students to measure the time it took for the balls to drop giving a measure of the acceleration due to gravity. But he really just wanted to see what happened when all those bouncy balls hit the ground at once. Good thing he had several hundred students there for Geek Week to clean up the mess.

            He even recreated the classic Cavendish experiment. A dumbbell-like rod with heavy masses at either end hangs from a long, thin thread. If you place two more masses on either side of the rod it slowly twists due to the weak gravitational attraction. The deflection of a laser affixed to the thread is proportional to the strength of gravity. With this you can measure the universal gravitational constant, one of the most fundamental numbers telling us how the universe works. Of course, he had to build one in his basement.

            Given his bubbling avidity for all things science, Shane is not the kind of guy who tends to keep things to himself. As it turns out, though, the man can sit on a secret. When I met with him in Casper, Wyoming for the total solar eclipse on August 21 of this year, he was bursting with his usual playful enthusiasm. He brought his telescopes and binoculars. We made pinhole cameras out of Ritz crackers. We ate our way through stacks of Oreo cookies, first sculpting the frosting with toothpicks into models of the total eclipse. The solar corona never tasted so good.

            But Shane was hiding a whopper of a secret. Just days before the eclipse, he, along with 4,000 other gravitational wave researchers, “saw” the spacetime rippling of two merging neutron stars simultaneously detected by 70 observatories on seven continents. It was a landmark discovery, observing both gravitational waves and electromagnetic waves of the same astrophysical event. And neither he nor the others in on the discovery told friends or family until the it was officially announced on October 16, making headlines worldwide.

            “I knew about GW170817 while I was at #Eclipse2017.” he posted on recently on social media, referring to the August 17, 2017 observation of a gravitational wave.

            I asked Shane how it felt to keep such a secret while we watched our first total solar eclipse.

            “Some of my friends have asked ‘how can you have lied to us?,’ he told me, “I'm not worried I lied to you, I lied to my own mother about this!”

            There were good reasons to wait for the official announcement. “The reason we want to keep everything secret is we want to check to make sure we're confident in the results,” Shane told me, “But underlying that is this nearly unattainable goal to say everything so perfectly that the results are unassailable.”

            It’s a tricky bit, being a scientist. We need to get it right, for us and for our colleagues. The news cycle doesn’t allow for peer review. When we finally find our most amazing discoveries, we’d better have our ducks in a row.

            For someone like Shane whose life revolves around sharing science, keeping such a secret must be unbearable. But perhaps he’s gotten a taste for it. When I spoke with him recently he hinted that there were more discoveries under wraps: “On the day of the eclipse, we had two new events in our pocket,” he said, “For all you know, I'm lying to you right now!”

Live Streaming Event 2 - Storytelling with Ben Lillie of StoryCollider.org

I'm thinking about an upcoming talk I'm giving called "Building Trust: Advocating for Real Science in a Fake News World." After Ben Lillie's session, I flipped through the slides I'd prepared over the last few days, and I could see that storytelling was largely absent. There were slides on how we spend science dollars in the US, and graphs with the breakdown of industry vs. government R&D. Blocks of text about how to call your congressperson, or how to run for office.

But this has been one hell of year. Since Jan 21, I have marched with scientists on Washington. I have protested white supremacy. I funded a billboard to harangue my congressman into holding town hall meetings. I am running my spouse's "Stacy Palen for Mayor" campaign. I am calling my congress people every third or fourth day. I have my local reps on speed dial, and resistbot is running constantly in the background.

In other words, I've got stories. You'd better believe it.

Ben founded Story Collider, kind of The Moth Radio Hour for science. Ben's a fellow physicist, but he jumped ship after earning his PhD to study improv and storytelling. As a physicist, you are trained to question everything. "As soon as an idea jumps into your head," Ben says, "you ask 'what is wrong with this?'" Improv is just the opposite, where you are supposed to just say yes to whatever your collaborators do or say and ask "what is right about this idea?"

He talked about the tension between storytelling and accuracy. Stacy's family is Irish, and her grandfather used to admonish her mom for "telling stories," his euphemism for lying. "Yer just tellin' stories, Margaret" he'd say in his thick half Irish, half Boston brogue. Now Stacy writes astronomy textbooks, some very good ones, where her desire to tell compelling stories often hits a wall with reviewers. "You didn't mention the importance of the Kirkwood Gaps in the planetary formation theories, you should cut some of the storytelling to make room." As Ben said, it is hard to tell completely accurate compelling stories.

Ben discussed the use of narrative, and reminded us we have a wealth of cultural forms to choose from. If Pixar can have a successful "story skeleton" why not borrow it? Both Hollywood and Broadway tell amazing stories. Why can't we use those ideas to talk about science? 

According to Ben, "If you aren't out there telling your story, someone else is." There are lots of folks out there telling very compelling and blatantly false stories about climate change. My stories need to be more compelling than that. What about all of the stories about my NASA friends who sacrifice their leisure time to make sure we have the best data available to study this? How do they see the "refocusing" of NASA to downplay Earth science? How must they feel seeing their life's work belittled as "Fake News?"

So I've got six days to revamp my talk. Six days to develop something to motivate my fellow scientists and students to join me in promoting, communicating, and defending science.

Because when 100,000 reclusive nerds are marching in the streets because people think there are "alternative facts," we've got some serious work to do.

 

Live Streaming Event 1 - Connecting With Your Audience: Featuring Alan Alda & Mariette DiChristina

Some general impressions on the live session:

Today we heard from Alan Alda, in his role as a science communicator, and Mariette DiChristina, Editor-in-Chief for Scientific American. Out of the gate:

"The human connection that comes about best through improv exercises is the fundamental element in communication. If you are not concerned with what is going on inside their head you are only worried about the message you are crafting. And if all you have is a message and you don't have connection ... you might as well not have a message." Alan Alda.

This comment hit me today listening to the opening session of our science blogging course. All too often I'm more interested in the message I'm crafting. Trying to find a way to be more persuasive, I rarely hold in my head an idea of what my audience is thinking, at least when it comes to writing. When teaching I have a pretty good idea of what my students are thinking, because I can see them responding to me and I can change my approach to help their understanding. But when I am writing, I am more concerned with what I am trying to say instead of being concerned with how the reader is responding to it. I'm intrigued by the notion that improv courses might improve this.

Mariette DiCristina spoke about the role of storytelling in Scientific American. Since its inception, the magazine has been about the personal trials of scientific research. What are the points of tension and drama? What were the mistakes? My favorite quote "In science, when people fail they fail forward." Once again, these storytelling techniques I employ in my classroom rarely make it into my writing. 

Alan mentioned Marie Curie's dissertation as having incredible clarity and elements of story telling. "I did this, then this happened, and this other part was hard." I made a note to myself to go read it.